<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SID CITY &#187; Technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://sidcity.visionenhanced.com/category/technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://sidcity.visionenhanced.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2008 03:22:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Flash and SEO</title>
		<link>http://sidcity.visionenhanced.com/2007/12/17/flash-and-seo/</link>
		<comments>http://sidcity.visionenhanced.com/2007/12/17/flash-and-seo/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Terrence Covin</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[deeplinking flash]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Flash and SEO]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[indexing flash]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[web 2.0 flash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://sidcity.visionenhanced.com/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unless you&#8217;ve been living under a rock over the past few years you are probably aware of the never ending debate on Flash and it&#8217;s &#8220;lack&#8221; of SEO capability. However we have found it rather &#8220;annoying&#8221; that this is still such a debate. Amongst all of these so called experts on Web 2.0, SEO, W3C, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://sidcity.visionenhanced.com/2007/12/17/flash-and-seo/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
